Apr 072012
 

After reading the news that some group of Neo Nazis have descended on Sanford, FL in response to racial tensions over the Trayvon Martin fatal shooting my heart sank.  “Oh, yeah, that’s just what we need… yet more ignorant hatred.”  Then several hours (and some sleep) later I find that some (reported as white) nutjob in N. Tulsa, OK has shot five people, all black, in four different shootings.  Three are dead and two are listed as injured (CNN early report).

I have no idea whether the Tulsa shootings are in any way connected to the Trayvon Martin shooting hype.  Yes, in my private thoughts I entertain the idea that it probably is, but that’s one great big huge assumption on my part – and not one I’m “married to”.  It might turn out that this is so completely mundane (in today’s reality) as to be drug related or some personal vendetta wholly unrelated to anything outside of Tulsa.  Or, even, just some genuine crazy hater who woke up yesterday and decided his cat just told him to go out and shoot black men.

At this point any theory is just that – a theory. But human beings always do try to make sense of their world.  As thinking human beings we need to remember that just because we may believe something that “something” isn’t necessarily true.  After all, people once believed the earth was the center of the heavens – and flat.  Or, that tossing children down a really deep hole in the ground would bring rain.  Or, that owning another human being was somehow OK.

I close this troubling post with a suggesting that everyone who is inclined to believe they know enough to believe a theory is in fact, well, a fact, should read this: Incompetent People Too Ignorant to Know It.  And that gentle suggestion goes for the Treyvon Martin shooting as much as it does the Tulsa OK shootings.


 

Mar 112012
 

One entire ocean and continent separate me from the events at Fukushima.  And now one entire year as well.

Spatial and temporal distance have not dulled the horror that was the Fukushima disaster.

Words still fail.

 

My thoughts respectfully pay honor to those that died, to those that survived, and to those that continue to struggle to rebuild.

Mar 102012
 

I had a truly genuine laugh Friday.  One of those laughs that at the end of it you are wiping tears from your eyes.

Aimlessly buzzing the net I stumbled into the story of Gloria Allred’s letter to Palm Beach County State Attorney Michael McAuliffe requesting that he investigate the possibilities of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh for his comments referencing Sandra Fluke.  I’m confident I have no need to rehash the actual incident since it’s been so thoroughly trod already that one would need to be a hermit in the Himalayans to not know what happened and what was said.  The Allred chapter of the circus can be found on Politico.

I’m not defending Mr. Limbaugh.  A) He doesn’t need my defense and B) He’s offered a very humble apology, quite publicly.  But what I found so hilarious was the fact that music enjoyed by the average person in Ms Fluke’s demographic celebrates using such terms for women and even girls.  And do I need to say, expressions fully protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

And then I had the brilliant thought that I hoped Mr. Limbaugh is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and that

He needs to face the consequences of his conduct in every way that is meaningful. [Ms Allred]

Here are the parameters of the “crime” according to the Politico article:

The statute stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree. [emphasis added].

If a female wishes to use birth control to prevent pregnancy and said woman is not married she is, by definition, not chaste.  Mr Limbaugh may meet the “malicious” requirement of the proof of committing this most heinous of crimes [please, do note the dripping sarcasm] but he does not meet the “falsely” component.

 

In actuality, I do hate the general lack of civility in public discourse.  I don’t listen to Mr Limbaugh’s program for just that reason.  But the general lack of civility in public discourse exists across the political spectrum.  However, we do have the First Amendment of the Constitution I referenced above.  Freedom of speech.  And yet again it is a Liberal that is demonstrating they only believe in the First Amendment when it protects speech they agree with.  Folks, that’s not “free speech”… that’s censorship.  Not only is it censorship but it’s censorship enforced at the end of a gun barrel.

Perhaps Ms Flukes should ring up Ms Palin for advice on how a public person (something Ms Flukes became with her public advocacy on the contraceptives and insurance coverage issue) might handle personal attacks from those that don’t agree with them.  I’m confident she would have a great deal of field tested advice to offer the aggrieved Ms Flukes.

 

 

 

© 2012 Mental Pluff Mud We must all obey the great law of change. It is the most powerful law of nature, and the means perhaps of its conservation. Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha